Leta i den här bloggen

fredag 29 maj 2020

SARS CoV irottaa nukleoporiini NUP93 :n NPC kompleksista

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30943371/
 2019 Dec;97(6):758-766.
doi: 10.1139/bcb-2018-0394. Epub 2019 Apr 3.
SARS Coronavirus Protein nsp1 Disrupts Localization of Nup93 From the Nuclear Pore Complex
PMID: 30943371
DOI: 10.1139/bcb-2018-0394 
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus nonstructural protein 1 (nsp1) is a key factor in virus-induced down-regulation of host gene expression. In infected cells, nsp1 engages in a multipronged mechanism to inhibit host gene expression by binding to the 40S ribosome to block the assembly of translationally competent ribosome, and then inducing endonucleolytic cleavage and the degradation of host mRNAs. Here, we report a previously undetected mechanism by which nsp1 exploits the nuclear pore complex and disrupts the nuclear–cytoplasmic transport of biomolecules. We identified members of the nuclear pore complex  from the nsp1-associated protein assembly and found that the expression of nsp1 in HEK cells disrupts Nup93 localization around the nuclear envelope without triggering proteolytic degradation, while the nuclear lamina remains unperturbed. Consistent with its role in host shutoff, nsp1 alters the nuclear–cytoplasmic distribution of an RNA binding protein, nucleolin. Our results suggest that nsp1, alone, can regulate multiple steps of gene expression including nuclear–cytoplasmic transport.

References
  •  
    Ao Z, Jayappa KD, Wang B, Zheng Y, Wang X, Peng J, Yao X. 2012. Contribution of host nucleoporin 62 in HIV-1 integrase chromatin association and viral DNA integration. J. Biol. Chem. 287(13): 10544-10555 Crossref, Medline, ISIGoogle Scholar.
  •  
    Bernad R, van der Velde H, Fornerod M, Pickersgill H. 2004. Nup358/RanBP2 attaches to the nuclear pore complex via association with Nup88 and Nup214/CAN and plays a supporting role in CRM1-mediated nuclear protein export. Mol. Cell Biol. 24(6): 2373-2384 Crossref, Medline, ISIGoogle Scholar.Nuclear pore complexes (NPCs) traverse the nuclear envelope (NE), providing a channel through which nucleocytoplasmic transport occurs. Nup358/RanBP2, Nup214/CAN, and Nup88 are components of the cytoplasmic face of the NPC. Here we show that Nup88 localizes midway between Nup358 and Nup214 and physically interacts with them. RNA interference of either Nup88 or Nup214 in human cells caused a strong reduction of Nup358 at the NE. Nup88 and Nup214 showed an interdependence at the NPC and were not affected by the absence of Nup358. These data indicate that Nup88 and Nup214 mediate the attachment of Nup358 to the NPC. We show that localization of the export receptor CRM1 at the cytoplasmic face of the NE is Nup358 dependent and represents its empty state. Also, removal of Nup358 causes a distinct reduction in nuclear export signal-dependent nuclear export. We propose that Nup358 provides both a platform for rapid disassembly of CRM1 export complexes and a binding site for empty CRM1 recycling into the nucleus.
  •  
    Bernad R, Engelsma D, Sanderson H, Pickersgill H, Fornerod M. 2006. Nup214-Nup88 nucleoporin subcomplex is required for CRM1-mediated 60 S preribosomal nuclear export. J. Biol. Chem. 281(28): 19378-19386 Crossref, Medline, ISIGoogle Scholar.The nuclear pore complex (NPC) conducts macromolecular transport to and from the nucleus and provides a kinetic/hydrophobic barrier composed of phenylalanine-glycine (FG) repeats. Nuclear transport is achieved through permeation of this barrier by transport receptors. The transport receptor CRM1 facilitates export of a large variety of cargoes. Export of the preribosomal 60 S subunit follows this pathway through the adaptor protein NMD3. Using RNA interference, we depleted two FG-containing cytoplasmically oriented NPC complexes, Nup214-Nup88 and Nup358, and investigated CRM1-mediated export.
  •  
    Borah S, Darricarrère N, Darnell A, Myoung J, Steitz JA. 2011. A viral nuclear noncoding RNA binds re-localized poly(A) binding protein and is required for late KSHV gene expression. PLoS Pathog. 7(10): e1002300 Crossref, Medline, ISIGoogle Scholar.
  •  
    Bunimov N, Smith JE, Gosselin D, Laneuville O. 2007. Translational regulation of PGHS-1 mRNA: 5′ untranslated region and first two exons conferring negative regulation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1769(2): 92-105 Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar.
  •  
    Chen J, Guo K, Kastan MB. 2012. Interactions of nucleolin and ribosomal protein L26 (RPL26) in translational control of human p53 mRNA. J. Biol. Chem. 287(20): 16467-16476 Crossref, Medline, ISIGoogle Scholar.
  •  
    Copeland AM, Newcomb WW, Brown JC. 2009. Herpes simplex virus replication: roles of viral proteins and nucleoporins in capsid-nucleus attachment. J. Virol. 83(4): 1660-1668 Crossref, Medline, ISIGoogle Scholar.
  •  
    Di Nunzio F, Danckaert A, Fricke T, Perez P, Fernandez J, Perret E, et al. 2012. Human nucleoporins promote HIV-1 docking at the nuclear pore, nuclear import and integration. PLoS One 7(9): e46037 Crossref, Medline, ISIGoogle Scholar.
  •  
    Furusawa Y, Yamada S, Kawaoka Y. 2018. Host factor nucleoporin 93 is involved in the nuclear export of influenza virus RNA. Front. Microbiol. 9: 1675 Crossref, Medline, ISIGoogle Scholar.
  •  
    Ghisolfi-Nieto L, Joseph G, Puvion-Dutilleul F, Amalric F, Bouvet P. 1996. Nucleolin is a sequence-specific RNA-binding protein: characterization of targets on pre-ribosomal RNA. J. Mol. Biol. 260(1): 34-53 Crossref, Medline, ISIGoogle Scholar.
  •  
    Grandi P, Dang T, Pané N, Shevchenko A, Mann M, Forbes D, Hurt E. 1997. Nup93, a vertebrate homologue of yeast Nic96p, forms a complex with a novel 205-kDa protein and is required for correct nuclear pore assembly. Mol Biol Cell 8(10): 2017-2038 Crossref, Medline, ISIGoogle Scholar.
  •  
    Gustin KE, Sarnow P. 2001. Effects of poliovirus infection on nucleo-cytoplasmic trafficking and nuclear pore complex composition. EMBO J. 20(1–2): 240-249 Crossref, Medline, ISIGoogle Scholar.
  •  
    Gustin KE, Sarnow P. 2002. Inhibition of nuclear import and alteration of nuclear pore complex composition by rhinovirus. J. Virol. 76(17): 8787-8796 Crossref, Medline, ISIGoogle Scholar.
  •  
    Hawryluk-Gara LA, Shibuya EK, Wozniak RW. 2005. Vertebrate Nup53 interacts with the nuclear lamina and is required for the assembly of a Nup93-containing complex. Mol. Biol. Cell 16(5): 2382-2394 Crossref, Medline, ISIGoogle Scholar.
  •  
    Huang C, Lokugamage KG, Rozovics JM, Narayanan K, Semler BL, Makino S. 2011. SARS coronavirus nsp1 protein induces template-dependent endonucleolytic cleavage of mRNAs: viral mRNAs are resistant to nsp1-induced RNA cleavage. PLoS Pathog. 7(12): e1002433 Crossref, Medline, ISIGoogle Scholar.
  •  
    Huang SH, Lee TY, Lin YJ, Wan L, Lai CH, Lin CW. 2017. Phage display technique identifies the interaction of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus open reading frame 6 protein with nuclear pore complex interacting protein NPIPB3 in modulating Type I interferon antagonism. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 50(3): 277-285 Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar.
  •  
    Ibarra A, Benner C, Tyagi S, Cool J, Hetzer MW. 2016. Nucleoporin-mediated regulation of cell identity genes. Genes Dev. 30(20): 2253-2258 Crossref, Medline, ISIGoogle Scholar.The organization of the genome in the three-dimensional space of the nucleus is coupled with cell type-specific gene expression. However, how nuclear architecture influences transcription that governs cell identity remains unknown. Here, we show that nuclear pore complex (NPC) components Nup93 and Nup153 bind superenhancers (SE), regulatory structures that drive the expression of key genes that specify cell identity. We found that nucleoporin-associated SEs localize preferentially to the nuclear periphery, and absence of Nup153 and Nup93 results in dramatic transcriptional changes of SE-associated genes. Our results reveal a crucial role of NPC components in the regulation of cell type-specifying genes and highlight nuclear architecture as a regulatory layer of genome functions in cell fate.
  •  
    Jauregui AR, Savalia D, Lowry VK, Farrell CM, Wathelet MG. 2013. Identification of residues of SARS-CoV nsp1 that differentially affect inhibition of gene expression and antiviral signaling. PLoS One 8(4): e62416 Crossref, Medline, ISIGoogle Scholar.
  •  
    Kamitani W, Narayanan K, Huang C, Lokugamage K, Ikegami T, Ito N, Kubo H, et al. 2006. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus nsp1 protein suppresses host gene expression by promoting host mRNA degradation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 103(34): 12885-12890 Crossref, Medline, ISIGoogle Scholar.
  •  
    Kamitani W, Huang C, Narayanan K, Lokugamage KG, Makino S. 2009. A two-pronged strategy to suppress host protein synthesis by SARS coronavirus Nsp1 protein. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 16(11): 1134-1140 Crossref, Medline, ISIGoogle Scholar.
  •  
    Knockenhauer KE, Schwartz TU. 2016. The nuclear pore complex as a flexible and dynamic gate. Cell 164(6): 1162-1171 Crossref, Medline, ISIGoogle Scholar.
  •  
    Labade AS, Karmodiya K, Sengupta K. 2016. HOXA repression is mediated by nucleoporin Nup93 assisted by its interactors Nup188 and Nup205. Epigenetics Chromatin 9: 54 Crossref, Medline, ISIGoogle Scholar.
  •  
    Le Sage V, Mouland AJ. 2013. Viral subversion of the nuclear pore complex. Viruses 5(8): 2019-2042 Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar.Numerous viral pathogens have evolved different mechanisms to hijack the NPC in order to regulate trafficking of viral proteins, genomes and even capsids into and out of the nucleus thus promoting virus replication.
  •  
    Lee P-T, Liao P-C, Chang W-C, Tseng JT. 2007. Epidermal growth factor increases the interaction between nucleolin and heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein K/poly(C) binding protein 1 complex to regulate the gastrin mRNA turnover. Mol. Biol. Cell 18(12): 5004-5013 Crossref, Medline, ISIGoogle Scholar.
  •  
    Lokugamage KG, Narayanan K, Huang C, Makino S. 2012. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus protein nsp1 is a novel eukaryotic translation inhibitor that represses multiple steps of translation initiation. J. Virol. 86(24): 13598-13608 Crossref, Medline, ISIGoogle Scholar.
  •  
    Lokugamage KG, Narayanan K, Nakagawa K, Terasaki K, Ramirez SI, Tseng C-TK, Makino S. 2015. Middle east respiratory syndrome coronavirus nsp1 inhibits host gene expression by selectively targeting mRNAs transcribed in the nucleus while sparing mRNAs of cytoplasmic origin. J. Virol. 89(21): 10970-10981 Crossref, Medline, ISIGoogle Scholar.
  •  
    McBride AE, Schlegel A, Kirkegaard K. 1996. Human protein Sam68 relocalization and interaction with poliovirus RNA polymerase in infected cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93(6): 2296-2301 Crossref, Medline, ISIGoogle Scholar.
  •  
    Mühlbauer D, Dzieciolowski J, Hardt M, Hocke A, Schierhorn KL, Mostafa A, et al. 2015. Influenza virus-induced caspase-dependent enlargement of nuclear pores promotes nuclear export of viral ribonucleoprotein complexes. J. Virol. 89(11): 6009-6021 Crossref, Medline, ISIGoogle Scholar.
  •  
    Naetar N, Ferraioli S, Foisner R. 2017. Lamins in the nuclear interior - life outside the lamina. J. Cell Sci. 130(13): 2087-2096 Crossref, Medline, ISIGoogle Scholar.
  •  
    Nakielny S, Siomi MC, Siomi H, Michael WM, Pollard V, Dreyfuss G. 1996. Transportin: nuclear transport receptor of a novel nuclear protein import pathway. Exp. Cell Res. 229(2): 261-266 Crossref, Medline, ISIGoogle Scholar.https://www.genecards.org/cgi-bin/carddisp.pl?gene=TNPO3&keywords=transportin 
  •  
    Narayanan K, Huang C, Lokugamage K, Kamitani W, Ikegami T, Tseng C-TK, Makino S. 2008. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus nsp1 suppresses host gene expression, including that of type I interferon, in infected cells. J. Virol. 82(9): 4471-4479 Crossref, Medline, ISIGoogle Scholar.
  •  
    Park N, Katikaneni P, Skern T, Gustin KE. 2008. Differential targeting of nuclear pore complex proteins in poliovirus-infected cells. J. Virol. 82(4): 1647-1655 Crossref, Medline, ISIGoogle Scholar.
  •  
    Park N, Skern T, Gustin KE. 2010. Specific cleavage of the nuclear pore complex protein Nup62 by a viral protease. J. Biol. Chem. 285(37): 28796-28805 Crossref, Medline, ISIGoogle Scholar.several nucleoporins, including Nup62 are degraded in cells infected with human rhinovirus (HRV) and poliovirus (PV) and that this contributes to the disruption of certain nuclear transport pathways.
  •  
    Porter FW, Palmenberg AC. 2009. Leader-induced phosphorylation of nucleoporins correlates with nuclear trafficking inhibition by cardioviruses. J. Virol. 83(4): 1941-1951 Crossref, Medline, ISIGoogle Scholar.
  •  
    Porter FW, Brown B, Palmenberg AC. 2010. Nucleoporin phosphorylation triggered by the encephalomyocarditis virus (EMCV)  leader protein is mediated by mitogen-activated protein kinases. J. Virol. 84(24): 12538-12548 Crossref, Medline, ISIGoogle Scholar.Picornaviruses induce profound changes in cellular gene expression and macromolecular trafficking during infection. Following translation of the positive-sense genomic RNA by host machinery, the viral polyprotein is processed by self-encoded proteases into functional elements that transform the host cell into a virus factory (38, 42). The viral polymerase (3D) and associated proteins convert endoplasmic reticulum (ER) or Golgi components into membranous RNA replication complexes, while other viral proteins act to quickly disrupt cellular transcription, translation, and nucleocytoplasmic trafficking (13, 18)As a consequence, cellular resources are redirected to the production of viral progeny, since host gene expression and innate antiviral responses are kept in check. Although all picornaviruses encode a 3C protease responsible for cleavage of elements in cellular transcription pathways (8, 25, 50), viruses from different genera use unique cadres of effector proteins and resultant mechanisms to inhibit cellular translation and nucleocytoplasmic trafficking. The enterovirus (poliovirus or rhinovirus) 2A protease, as an example, cleaves the translation factor eIF4G, thwarting eIF4E binding and thereby preventing cellular (cap-dependent) translation (16, 19). This enzyme also targets a subset of nucleoporin (Nup) proteins within nuclear pore complexes (NPC), including Nup62, Nup98, and Nup153 (18, 39). The resulting loss of Phe-Gly (FG) repeat elements normally displayed by these Nups leads to a failure of nuclear import/export pathways, since FG contacts provide essential docking domains for transport receptors (e.g., karyopherins) carrying nuclear import or export signal (NLS or NES)-containing cargos across the NPC (5, 47).Viruses in the Cardiovirus genus, as typified by encephalomyocarditis virus (EMCV) and Theiler's virus (TMEV), have nonenzymatic 2A and L proteins that are not homologs of the same proteins in other picornaviruses. Cardioviruses are nonetheless able to inhibit cellular translation and nucleocytoplasmic trafficking. During EMCV infection, ribosomes become altered in a still unresolved 2A-dependent manner, such that viral RNAs, rather than cellular mRNAs, are preferentially translated (1, 17)
  •  
    Schmidt-Zachmann MS, Nigg EA. 1993. Protein localization to the nucleolus: a search for targeting domains in nucleolin. J. Cell Sci. 105(Pt 3): 799-806 MedlineGoogle Scholar.
  •  
    Sevajol M, Subissi L, Decroly E, Canard B, Imbert I. 2014. Insights into RNA synthesis, capping, and proofreading mechanisms of SARS-coronavirus. Virus Res. 194: 90-99 Crossref, Medline, ISIGoogle Scholar.
  •  
    Tanaka T, Kamitani W, DeDiego ML, Enjuanes L, Matsuura Y. 2012. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus nsp1 facilitates efficient propagation in cells through a specific translational shutoff of host mRNA. J. Virol. 86(20): 11128-11137 Crossref, Medline, ISIGoogle Scholar. A nonstructural SCoV nsp1 protein causes a severe translational shutoff by binding to the 40S ribosomal subunits. The nsp1-40S ribosome complex further induces an endonucleolytic cleavage near the 5′UTR of host mRNA..
  •  
    Terrier O, Carron C, De Chassey B, Dubois J, Traversier A, Julien T, et al. 2016. Nucleolin interacts with influenza A nucleoprotein and contributes to viral ribonucleoprotein complexes nuclear trafficking and efficient influenza viral replication. Sci. Rep. 6: 29006 Crossref, Medline, ISIGoogle Scholar.
  •  
    Vollmer B, Antonin W. 2014. The diverse roles of the Nup93/Nic96 complex proteins — structural scaffolds of the nuclear pore complex with additional cellular functions. Biol. Chem. 395(5): 515-528 Crossref, Medline, ISIGoogle Scholar.
    • Download Figure
    • Download figure as PowerPoint slideDespite their huge size, NPCs are composed of only around 30 different nucleoporins. Because of the eight-fold symmetry of the pore, nucleoporins are present in 8, 16, 32 or more copies per NPC (for a review see Bilokapic and Schwartz, 2012; Grossman et al., 2012; Adams and Wente, 2013). They can be roughly categorized into those forming the scaffold of the pore, the structural nucleoporins, and those responsible for the transport functions of the NPC. The latter contain a high number of phenylalanine glycine (FG) repeats that form a meshwork via cohesive interactions within the pore, which in turn excludes most macromolecules from the passage but allows translocation of import and export receptor-bound targets (for a review see Fried and Kutay, 2003; Wente and Rout, 2010). Thus, these nucleoporins are important for both the exclusion and for the transport capabilities of the pore.
      The overall scaffolding structure of the NPC can be seen as a stack of three rings (Figure 1): The outer or cytoplasmic ring is connected to the cytoplasmic filaments whereas the nuclear ring is connected to the nuclear basket. Sandwiched between those two peripheral rings and located in the mid-plane of the nuclear envelope lays the spoke or inner ring. The inner ring is laterally linked to the pore membrane and connected to the central transport channel formed mostly by the FG-repeat-containing nucleoporins. Although NPC dimension and mass vary among organisms this overall structural arrangement, including the eight-fold symmetry, is conserved.
  •  
    Waggoner S, Sarnow P. 1998. Viral ribonucleoprotein complex formation and nucleolar-cytoplasmic relocalization of nucleolin in poliovirus-infected cells. J. Virol. 72(8): 6699-6709 Medline, ISIGoogle Scholar.https://www.genecards.org/cgi-bin/carddisp.pl?gene=NCL&keywords=nucleolin
  •  
    Zhang L, Zhang ZP, Zhang XE, Lin FS, Ge F. 2010. Quantitative proteomics analysis reveals BAG3 as a potential target to suppress severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus replication. J. Virol. 84(12): 6050-6059 Crossref, Medline, ISIGoogle Scholar.In the present work, the most distinguishable proteins to be downregulated in SARS-CoV replicon cells were those involved in the host translational machinery, including 40S ribosomal proteins (RPS10, RPS18, and RPS19), 60S ribosomal proteins (RPL18, RPL27A, and RPL36), and eukaryotic translation initiation factors (EIF2S1, EIF5B, and EIF4A2). Such host translational downregulation is frequently observed, as evident in infections with herpes simplex virus (15), poliovirus (34), and SARS-CoV (37). Recently, it was reported that SARS-CoV nsp1 protein uses a two-pronged strategy to inhibit host translation and gene expression by binding to the 40S ribosomal subunit and inactivating the translational activity of the 40S subunits (26). Thus, downregulation of the host translational machinery may play an important role in SARS-CoV replication in host cells.Two regulatory molecules, Cdc42 and RhoA, were found to be downregulated in replicon cells. Cdc42 and RhoA belong to the Rho family of small GTPases. These proteins play a role in cell migration, membrane traffic, and actin cytoskeleton reorganization (6). It has also been shown that Cdc42 regulates the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)-mTOR pathway (6, 16) and PI3K/Akt signaling pathways are important for establishing persistent SARS-CoV infection in Vero E6 cells (44, 45). Therefore, modulation of SARS-CoV replication by Cdc42 and RhoA may be mediated by the PI3K-mTOR pathway and the PI3K-mTOR pathway may be one of the key factors for understanding persistence of SARS-CoV replicon RNA in host cells.Other proteins of interest uncovered in this study include 14-3-3 proteins. The 14-3-3 proteins have emerged as critical regulators of diverse cellular responses in eukaryotic organisms (2, 17, 46). In mammalian cells, seven different isoforms have been identified (ζ, β, γ, ε, σ, η, and θ), with each isoform having distinct tissue localization and function. Through interactions with more than 400 target proteins identified so far, these 14-3-3 proteins are known to be involved in widespread biological processes such as signal transduction, cell cycle control, apoptosis, cellular metabolism, proliferation, cytoskeletal regulation, transcription, redox regulation, stress response, etc. (11, 61). Interesting evidence has been reported indicating that 14-3-3 might be important for host translational shutoff, the shutoff of minus strand synthesis, or other processes that are time dependent in virus-infected cells (12). Recently, it was also reported that 14-3-3 proteins are involved in the activation of signaling cascades during viral infection (48). Therefore, the increase in 14-3-3 protein expression is likely part of the cell's response to SARS-CoV replication and appears to represent a homeostatic mechanism for cell defense.In conclusion, the quantitative proteomics analysis described here identified many host factors that potentially affect SARS-CoV replication and implicated previously unconsidered pathways in the virus replication. By using siRNA, we also obtained evidence that depletion of BAG3 results in inhibition of virus replication. Our study provides important information for understanding SARS-CoV replication. Further studies will determine more directly how implicated host factors affect the virus and how such effects illuminate cellular functions and pathways.




Inga kommentarer:

Skicka en kommentar