Otan sitaatteja GITHUB tekstissä, ja muutaman eritysimaininnan siitä vyyhdimäisestä tilanteesta, jota tiedemiehet ovat tottuneet tässä selvittelemään etsiessään johtolankoja joihinkin erityisiin mutaatioihin Minusta jotkut mutaatiot eivät varsinaisesti ole evoluutiota, vaan vain energiatilan loppumista viruksen rakenteen koostamisyrityksissä ja sitten stoikkastisesta muutoksesta, joka ihan sattumoisin on tapahtunut ja kuitenkin on saattanut koostumusta vielä muutaman kerran toistua, mutta linjaa ei sen koommin ole esiintynyt eikä merkattu. Jokin kohta rakeknteessa saattaa olla erityisen altis muuttumaan eri varianteissa olosuhteista ja energiatilasta ( tai lähinnä energian puutteesta) riippuen, eikä siksi että ne olisivat jotain samaa linjaa. Japanissa on kuitenkin päivittäiset tartuntatapaukset vielä suuri luku! Tämä virus on tosi loinen, sillä se kehrää ihmisen proteiinit ja mineraalit niin että moni laihtuu tämän infektion aikana haitallisesti- lisäksi hajun ja makuaistin poissaolo vähentää ravinnonottoa ja ihmisen yleiskunnon heiketessä virus menestyy edelleen. Vaikka pandemia muuttuisi endemiaksi se ei tarkoita että ei pitäisi asiaan kiinnittää huomiota. Endemiaksi muuttuminen voi olla yleiskuntojen alenemistilaa.
Closed GITHUBs
#687, BA.2.3.18 Japan 138 sekvenssiä.
Milestone 14.7.2022
https://github.com/cov-lineages/pango-designation/issues/687
Spike:I692F, Membrane:I76V.
#745, BA.2.56.1 Milestone 13.6. 2022
https://github.com/cov-lineages/pango-designation/issues/745,
Description Potential sublineage of: BA.2.56 (the European
sublineage with spike L452M from the BA.2 root) Earliest
sequence: 2022/03/27 (Japan-Hyogo prefecture) Most
recent sequence: 2022/05/21 (Japan-Kochi
prefecture)Mutations on top of BA.2:
Gene
|
Amino
changes
|
ORF1a
|
R226K
(67/75)
|
Spike
|
H69Y, L452M,
W886L
|
ORF3a
|
A31S (48/75)
|
#605, BA.2.3.11 Milestone 13.6. 2022.
https://github.com/cov-lineages/pango-designation/issues/605
Proposal for new
sub-lineage of BA.2.3 with C13326T (ORF1ab: T4354I) and A20214G
(synonymous) in Japan (858 sequences as of 2022-06-07, 13.4% of
BA.2.3 in Japan) #605
".. this proposed sublineage is only 4.5% (=130/2864) of the BA.2.3
isolated in Japan, which is a small number.However, our proposed
sublineage is characterized by its high locality within
Japan.
Therefore, I believe that it would be useful for genome
surveillance in Japan if this proposed sublineage can be easily
confirmed together with the conventional BA.2.3 and BA.2.3.1,
the main lineage of the BA.2 lineage in Japan. Thank you in
advance for your consideration.
7.6. 2022: For the updated data, the proposed lineage has
increased to 13.4 % (= 858 / 6399) of BA.2.3 in Japan.
13.6.2022 Chrisruis: Thanks @takaabe8050 The geographical focus of
this clade in Japan means that it has an associated epidemiological
event so warrants a designation. We spotted this independently and
added it as BA.2.3.11. Thanks again
#600 , BA.2.24, Milestone 2.5. 2022.
https://github.com/cov-lineages/pango-designation/issues/600
A BA.2 lineage with
Spike:339N seems to be growing in Tokyo.
#590, XAC Milestone 10.6. 2022
Potential
BA.2*/BA.1*/BA.2* Recombinant with Double Breakpoints (244 Seqs in
Israel, Germany, Canada, Ireland, Netherland, Sweden, Japan, India,
UK and US as of 2022-06-10) #590
https://github.com/cov-lineages/pango-designation/issues/590
c19850727
commented on
2 Jun
171 sequences
as of 2022-06-01, and now newly found in India-KA and Japan ex-US.
|
AngieHinrichs
commented on
2 Jun
"Tangential, but I still want to make the distinction: BA.2 and its
descendants (BA.3, BA.4, BA.5)
BA.3, BA.4 and BA.5 are not
believed to be descendants of BA.2 (or they would be BA.2.X), but
rather separate emergences from the Omicron reservoir along with
BA.1 and BA.2. (There is some discussion for BA.3 in #367;
the Pango lineage designation committee had some internal
discussions about BA.4/BA.5 that unfortunately didn't make it into
#517.)
BA.4 and BA.5 are similar to BA.2, but lacking enough BA.2
mutations that it seems more likely that they arose separately
within the Omicron reservoir.
BA.4 and BA.5 split off from
the BA.2 branch of the UCSC/UShER tree, but that is only because
that's where they fit in with the fewest substitutions (including
reversions to reference for BA.2 mutations that are not found in
BA.4 & BA.5). The tree's basal Omicron branches are a mess
because there are many different combinations of false reversions
found in sequences, and (as far as I know) no actual pre-BA.*
ancestral Omicron sequences.
ktmeaton commented on 2 Jun:
"Thank you for catching and correcting that @AngieHinrichs! Just
to clarify, the topology of 22A
(BA.4) and 22B (BA.5) falling within
the diversity of 21L (BA.2) is not
true to their evolutionary origin because there is underlying
mutation conflicts? Or am I misinterpreting the tree or your
explanation? Thanks!"
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/14981272/171708141-6364bdf6-4e70-4b62-9b4f-9dafe617bdb6.png
|
AngieHinrichs commented on 2 Jun :
"21L on that tree is much broader than BA.2. It includes
recombinants (the sequences that appear below the 22A label;
England/PHEC-YYFJF3T/2022 says BA.2 in the pop-up but it's XW),
BA.4, BA.5, and BA.2 (the yellow-orange and red sequences above
22B). 21L is more like "Omicron minus BA.1 and BA.3".
"I think it actually does show the separation of BA.2, BA.4 and
BA.5, if you define BA.2 as the sequences above 22B. Some
reversions are still required to get that structure -- the branch
leading to 22A and 22B has a reversion on 23040 (shared by BA.1,
BA.2 and BA.3), and the branch to 22B has 5 more reversions
(again, tree structures can't be perfect when recombination might
have been involved). 22A and 22B are also missing C9866T which is
in nearly all BA.2 sequences, although as @corneliusroemer
has pointed out, lack of C9866T might actually be ancestral for
BA.2.
|
Hi @InfrPopGen, I
think we've resolved the major outstanding issue in this proposal
with the consensus that this is a BA.1/BA.2 recombinant with double
breakpoints. Are there any other problems to resolve before an
official designation? Title:
Potential
BA.2*/BA.1*/BA.2* Recombinant with Double Breakpoints (244 Seqs in
Israel, Germany, Canada, Ireland, Netherland, Sweden, Japan, India,
UK and US as of 2022-06-10) on
10 Jun
InfrPopGen
commented on 10 Jun
"Thanks for
submitting (and apologies for the delay). We've added recombinant
lineage XAC with 126 newly designated sequences, and 3 updated
designations".
|
#591 , XW, Milestone 10.6. 2022.
Potential
BA.1*/BA.2* Recombinant with Likely Breakpoint at NSP3 (53 Seqs as of
2022-05-11 in Japan, Germany, Slovenia, Canada, UK and US)
designated
recombinant
#587 Possible BA.2.3 sublineage with ORF1a:K798N starting in Northern
Mariana Islands and Guam (779 sequences in Cov-Spectrum) #587
https://github.com/cov-lineages/pango-designation/issues/587
#569 BA.2.10.2 Milestone
10.5. 2022.
https://github.com/cov-lineages/pango-designation/issues/569
fedeGueli: " While
checking for japanese airport surveillance sequences from India
@c19850727 (Sakaguchi Hitoshi) highlighted me that a significant
share of the last samples was carrying the E:R61L mutation.
Looking
at Japanese sequences we found that a BA.2.10 sublineage with E:R61L
circulates there .
Here we want to propose it, but it is worth
mentioning and monitoring that multiple BA.2 sublineages carry this
sublineage and one of them is actually growing quite fast in
Switzerland.
InfrPopGen commented on 10 May
Thanks for submitting. We've added lineage BA.2.10.2 with 50 newly
designated sequences, and 1 updated designations from BA.2.10.
Defining mutation(s) G26426T (E:61L).
#522, XU , BA.1/BA.2
https://github.com/cov-lineages/pango-designation/issues/522
Description Recombinant
between: BA.1* &
BA.2
Earliest
sequence:
2022/1/20 (Japan ex-India)
Most
recent sequence:
2022/3/4 (India-Maharashtra)
Countries
circulating:
India (3 seqs in Gurajat and 2 seqs in Maharashtra), Japan (1 seq
from imported case with travel history to India)
Likely
breakpoint:
between 6518 and 9343 (NSP3 or NSP4).
Conserved
Nuc mutations
(those in red frames are likely from the donor from the BA.1
side): chrisruis commented on 19 Apr
Thanks @c19850727 We've added this as XU.
|